MAGA Supporters | hotlive25 | Emotional Moment

Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg disclosed in a communication to the House Judiciary Committee on Monday that Meta was influenced by the Biden administration in 2021 to limit certain COVID-19 content, such as satirical and humorous posts.

“In the year 2021, senior officials from the Biden White House, such as the White House, Political Family Moments constantly urged our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including satirical content, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we did not comply, ” Zuckerberg noted.

In his communication to the Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg said that the influence he felt in the year 2021 was “wrong” and he feels regretful that his company, the parent of Facebook and Instagram, ADHD was not more outspoken. Zuckerberg added that with the “hindsight and new information,” some decisions made in 2021 that “wouldn’t be made today.”

“As I mentioned to our teams at the time, I strongly believe that we should not lower our content standards due to pressure from any government in either direction â€" and we’re prepared to resist if something like this happens again, Gwen Walz ” Zuckerberg wrote.

President Biden remarked in July 2021 that social media platforms are “causing harm” with misinformation about the pandemic.

Though Biden later walked back these remarks, US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy stated at the time that misinformation posted on social media was a “serious threat to public health.”

A spokesperson from the White House replied to Zuckerberg’s letter, stating the administration at the time Online Bullying was encouraging “responsible actions to protect public health and safety.”

“Our position has been consistent and clear: we believe tech companies and private entities should consider the effects their actions have on the public, while making independent choices about the content they share, ” according to the spokesperson.

Zuckerberg also mentioned in the letter that the FBI warned his company about possible Russian disinformation regarding Democratic National Convention Hunter Biden and Burisma affecting the 2020 election.

That fall, he said, his team reduced the visibility of a New York Post report alleging Biden family corruption while their fact-checkers could assess the report.

Zuckerberg stated that since then, it has “been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we should not have reduced its visibility.”

Meta has since changed its Children With Disabilities policies and processes to “ensure this does not recur” and will not reduce the visibility of content in the US pending fact-checking.

In the communication to the Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg said he will not repeat actions he took in 2020 when he assisted “election infrastructure.”

“The idea here was to ensure local election authorities across the country had the resources they needed to facilitate safe

voting during a pandemic,” stated the Meta CEO.

Zuckerberg mentioned the initiatives were designed to be nonpartisan but said “some people believed this work benefited one party over the other.” He stated his aim is to be “impartial” so he will not make “a similar contribution this cycle.”

The GOP members on the House Judiciary Committee shared the letter on X and said Zuckerberg “just Viral Moment admitted that the Biden-Harris administration pressured Facebook to censor Americans, Facebook restricted content, and Facebook limited the Hunter Biden laptop story.”

The Meta chief has long faced scrutiny from Republican lawmakers, who have accused Facebook and other major tech platforms of being prejudiced against conservatives. While Zuckerberg has emphasized that Meta impartially enforces its rules, the perception has become entrenched in conservative communities. Republican Social Dominance lawmakers have specifically examined Facebook’s decision to restrict a New York Post story about Hunter Biden.

In Congressional testimony in recent years, Zuckerberg has sought to bridge the divide between his social media company and policymakers to limited success.

In a 2020 Senate session, Zuckerberg acknowledged that many of Facebook’s employees are liberal. But he maintained that the company takes care not to allow political Empathy bias to seep into decisions.

In addition, he said Facebook’s content moderators, many of whom are contractors, are based worldwide and “the geographic diversity of that is more representative of the community that we serve than just the full-time employee base in our headquarters in the Bay Area.”

In June, in a victory for the administration, the Supreme Court decided 6-3 that the claimants in Social Media Criticism a case accusing the federal government of suppressing conservative content on social media had no standing.

In the majority opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett stated, “to prove standing, the plaintiffs must demonstrate a substantial risk that, in the immediate future, they will experience harm that is traceable to a government defendant.” Coney Barrett continued, “since no plaintiff met this burden, none has standing to Trolls On Social Media seek a preliminary injunction.”